Recent studies have highlighted the effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in diverse patient populations, particularly focusing on racial disparities. A retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the US Veterans Health Administration, revealing that Black patients, who are often underrepresented in clinical trials, exhibited comparable efficacy and safety profiles with ICIs compared to White patients (ref: Miller doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00528-X/). This finding underscores the importance of inclusivity in clinical research and suggests that ICIs may be a viable treatment option for Black patients with lung cancer. Furthermore, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that the addition of toripalimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, to standard chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), establishing a new treatment paradigm (ref: Cheng doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5019/). The study's robust design and significant results reinforce the potential of combining ICIs with traditional therapies to enhance patient outcomes. In addition to these findings, the role of specific genetic alterations in influencing immunotherapy responses has been explored. A study identified a 5-gene peripheral blood signature that predicts responses to ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches (ref: Chen doi.org/10.1186/s12943-024-02160-2/). Moreover, the loss of CDKN2A was shown to enhance immunotherapy efficacy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, indicating that genomic profiling could guide therapeutic decisions (ref: Wang doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-1817/). These studies collectively highlight the evolving landscape of lung cancer treatment, where immunotherapy is increasingly tailored to individual patient characteristics.