Recent studies have explored various neurosurgical interventions, particularly focusing on endovascular treatments and their outcomes. In a multicenter trial involving 530 patients, the efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) for medium-vessel occlusion was evaluated. The results indicated that 41.6% of patients in the EVT group achieved a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, compared to 43.1% in the usual-care group, with no significant difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates (ref: Goyal doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2411668/). Another study investigated the combination of normobaric hyperoxia with EVT for acute ischemic stroke, revealing that patients receiving hyperoxia had superior functional outcomes at 90 days, with a median mRS score of 2 compared to 3 in the control group (ref: Li doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02809-5/). This suggests that adjunct therapies may enhance the effectiveness of standard interventions. Additionally, a cohort study comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to vitamin K antagonists for cerebral venous thrombosis found no significant differences in primary outcome events or mortality rates, indicating that DOACs are a safe alternative (ref: van de Munckhof doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00519-2/). The VENTIBRAIN study further assessed mechanical ventilation practices in acute brain injury patients, highlighting variability in ventilator settings across ICUs and their association with clinical outcomes (ref: Robba doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07808-1/). Lastly, the impact of intravenous thrombolysis in patients on DOACs was evaluated, showing no significant differences in outcomes compared to those not on anticoagulation, reinforcing the safety of thrombolytic therapy in this population (ref: Matusevicius doi.org/10.1002/ana.27189/).