Recent studies have explored various neurosurgical interventions and their outcomes, particularly in the context of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and vertebrobasilar occlusion. A significant investigation by English et al. compared liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, finding no significant difference in functional outcomes at 12 months, with mean FIM scores of 82.8 in the liberal group and 79.8 in the restrictive group (ref: English doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2410962/). In a systematic review and meta-analysis by Nogueira et al., endovascular therapy for acute vertebrobasilar occlusion demonstrated a 2.75-fold increase in the likelihood of favorable functional outcomes, despite a heightened risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ref: Nogueira doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01820-8/). Furthermore, Richter et al. investigated recovery predictions in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients with normal CT scans, emphasizing the potential of serum biomarkers and diffusion tensor imaging to enhance prognostic models (ref: Richter doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102751/). These findings collectively highlight the complexity of treatment strategies and the necessity for tailored approaches based on individual patient profiles and clinical presentations.