Recent studies have explored various neurosurgical interventions and their outcomes, particularly focusing on chronic subdural hematoma and glioblastoma. In a multicenter trial, Miah et al. compared dexamethasone treatment to burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma, finding that while dexamethasone showed a lower adjusted common odds ratio of 0.55 for better outcomes on the modified Rankin scale at three months, it failed to demonstrate noninferiority to surgical intervention (ref: Miah doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2216767/). Roder et al. conducted a prospective controlled trial comparing intraoperative MRI guidance to 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in glioblastoma surgeries, concluding that there was no significant superiority of iMRI over 5-ALA, with complete resections achieved in 81% of the iMRI group compared to 78% in the 5-ALA group (ref: Roder doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.01862/). Furthermore, Prabhu et al. identified risk factors for progression and toxic effects post-preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery, highlighting that the extent of resection and primary tumor type were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (median OS of 17.2 months) (ref: Prabhu doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.1629/). These findings collectively emphasize the need for careful consideration of treatment modalities in neurosurgery, balancing efficacy and safety.