Recent studies have focused on the efficacy of thrombectomy in patients with acute basilar-artery occlusion. In one trial, thrombectomy performed 6 to 24 hours after stroke onset resulted in a modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 3 in 46% of patients compared to 24% in the control group, indicating a significant improvement in functional outcomes (ref: Jovin doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2207576/). However, this procedure was associated with a higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, occurring in 6% of the thrombectomy group versus 1% in the control group (risk ratio, 5.18; 95% CI, 0.64 to 42.18). Another study corroborated these findings, showing that endovascular thrombectomy within 12 hours of occlusion also led to improved outcomes, although it presented a 5% risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ref: Tao doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2206317/). Furthermore, a secondary analysis of the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism-Japan trial highlighted the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) as a predictor of outcomes, revealing that patients with ASPECTS 4 to 5 had a significantly higher chance of achieving a favorable mRS score at 90 days when treated with endovascular therapy (OR, 9.12; 95% CI, 2.80-29.70) (ref: Uchida doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3285/). These studies collectively emphasize the potential benefits of thrombectomy while also highlighting the risks associated with the procedure, particularly in the context of intracranial hemorrhage.