Recent advancements in neurosurgical techniques have focused on optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing procedures for stroke and epilepsy. A randomized trial comparing intravenous alteplase followed by endovascular treatment (EVT) versus EVT alone found no significant difference in disability outcomes at 90 days, with median modified Rankin scale scores of 3 and 2, respectively (ref: LeCouffe doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107727/). This suggests that while alteplase may not enhance outcomes, it does not detract from the efficacy of EVT. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis of thrombectomy for anterior circulation strokes beyond 6 hours indicated that patient selection remains critical, as the benefit of thrombectomy varies significantly depending on the timing and individual patient factors (ref: Jovin doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01341-6/). Furthermore, focused ultrasound thalamotomy studies revealed that lesion size and location significantly influence treatment outcomes, with larger lesions correlating with increased power delivery and temperature, highlighting the importance of precise lesion creation in achieving desired therapeutic effects (ref: Segar doi.org/10.1093/brain/). These findings underscore the necessity for tailored surgical approaches and the integration of advanced imaging techniques to enhance patient outcomes in neurosurgery.