Recent studies have focused on various neurosurgical interventions and their outcomes, particularly in the context of stroke and tumor management. Langezaal et al. conducted a study comparing endovascular therapy for stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion with standard medical care. They found that a favorable functional outcome occurred in 44.2% of patients in the endovascular group compared to 37.7% in the medical group, indicating a potential benefit of endovascular therapy (ref: Langezaal doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2030297/). However, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was significantly higher in the endovascular group (4.5% vs. 0.7%), raising concerns about safety (risk ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 0.9 to 53.0). In another study, Azizi et al. explored the efficacy of ultrasound renal denervation for hypertension resistant to multiple medications, demonstrating a significant reduction in blood pressure at two months compared to a sham procedure (ref: Azizi doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00788-1/). This suggests that innovative neurosurgical techniques may offer new treatment avenues for resistant conditions. Chen et al. performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on stereotactic radiosurgery for brainstem metastases, reporting a local control rate of 86% at one year and a low rate of treatment-related toxic effects (2.4%), highlighting the effectiveness and safety of this approach (ref: Chen doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1262/). These findings collectively underscore the evolving landscape of neurosurgical interventions, balancing efficacy and safety in patient outcomes.