Neurosurgical interventions, particularly mechanical thrombectomy, have shown significant promise in improving outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. A study conducted in Brazil demonstrated that patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy in conjunction with standard care exhibited a better distribution of modified Rankin scale scores at 90 days compared to those receiving standard care alone, with a common odds ratio of 2.28 (95% CI, 1.41 to 3.69; P = 0.001) (ref: Martins doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000120/). This finding aligns with another study focusing on mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion, which identified good collateral circulation and distal occlusions as independent predictors of favorable clinical outcomes (ref: Kwak doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029861/). In contrast, the ARUBA trial revealed that medical management alone was superior to interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations, suggesting that not all neurosurgical interventions yield beneficial outcomes (ref: Mohr doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30181-2/). Furthermore, the role of JAM-A as a microglial tumor suppressor in glioblastoma highlights the complex interplay between surgical interventions and tumor biology (ref: Turaga doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/). Overall, while mechanical thrombectomy has shown efficacy in acute stroke management, the findings from ARUBA caution against the universal application of interventional strategies in neurosurgery, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on individual patient circumstances.