Recent research has significantly advanced our understanding of the mechanisms and biomarkers associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). A pivotal study demonstrated that tau protein accumulation, independent of beta-amyloid, selectively impairs the complex-spike burst firing of CA1 hippocampal neurons, which is crucial for learning and memory (ref: Harris doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.04.006/). This finding emphasizes the role of tau in cognitive decline and suggests that targeting tau pathology could be a therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, transcriptional dysregulation has emerged as a critical factor in late-onset AD, with significant epigenomic changes observed in patients lacking common genetic risk factors (ref: Chen doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.03.045/). This highlights the complexity of AD pathology and the need for a multifaceted approach to understanding its development. In terms of biomarkers, several studies have identified promising candidates for diagnosing and monitoring AD. For instance, plasma levels of phospho-tau217 showed high accuracy for diagnosing AD in both primary and secondary care settings, with positive predictive values ranging from 82% to 95% (ref: Palmqvist doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03622-w/). Additionally, the newly identified plasma biomarker eMTBR-tau243 specifically reflects tau tangle pathology, offering a more accessible diagnostic tool compared to traditional imaging methods (ref: Horie doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03617-7/). Moreover, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have been linked to cognitive resilience and decline, revealing that traditional amyloid and tau markers explain only a fraction of cognitive impairment variance (ref: Oh doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03565-2/). These findings collectively underscore the importance of developing a comprehensive biomarker profile to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment monitoring in AD.