Microglial cells play a crucial role in neuroinflammation, with various studies highlighting their functions in different pathological contexts. One study demonstrated that AIM2, an inflammasome sensor, negatively regulates the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by inhibiting microglial activation and peripheral immune cell infiltration into the central nervous system (CNS), thus preventing neuroinflammation and demyelination (ref: Ma doi.org/10.1084/jem.20201796/). In contrast, another study found that microglial PGC-1α expression is upregulated following ischemic stroke, which helps protect against brain injury by suppressing neuroinflammation (ref: Han doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00863-5/). Furthermore, research on multiple sclerosis revealed that meningeal inflammation induces phenotypic changes in cortical microglia, which are associated with neurodegeneration, suggesting a complex interplay between microglial activation and disease progression (ref: van Olst doi.org/10.1007/s00401-021-02293-4/). These findings collectively underscore the dual role of microglia in both promoting and resolving neuroinflammation, depending on the context and stimuli present in the CNS environment. Additionally, the study of microglial responses to various inflammatory stimuli has revealed the potential for harnessing their properties for therapeutic purposes. For instance, exposure to IL-4 and IL-13 has been shown to elicit repair mechanisms in macrophages and microglia, enhancing their remyelinating properties (ref: Mishra doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1948-20.2021/). However, excessive inflammation can be detrimental, as evidenced by research indicating that activated microglia contribute to ependymal cell death following exposure to microbial neuraminidase (ref: Fernández-Arjona doi.org/10.1186/s12987-021-00249-0/). This highlights the importance of understanding the balance between beneficial and harmful microglial activation in the context of neuroinflammatory diseases.