Recent studies have focused on various treatment modalities for meningiomas, particularly high-grade variants which pose significant challenges due to their aggressive nature and limited therapeutic options. A phase 2 trial evaluated pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in 25 patients with recurrent high-grade meningiomas, revealing potential efficacy in this difficult-to-treat population (ref: Brastianos doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29052-7/). In contrast, a comparative analysis of active surveillance versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for incidental frontobasal meningiomas demonstrated that SRS resulted in a 0% progression rate compared to 52% in the active surveillance cohort (ref: Islim doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051300/). This suggests that SRS may be a more effective intervention for certain meningioma patients, particularly those with asymptomatic tumors, as further supported by a matched cohort analysis from the IMPASSE study, which found significant differences in local control rates (ref: Pikis doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000001924/). The role of preoperative embolization in improving surgical outcomes for giant meningiomas remains contentious. A matched cohort study indicated that embolization did not significantly enhance surgical or functional outcomes, highlighting the need for further investigation into its efficacy (ref: Yin doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.852327/). Additionally, a retrospective analysis of adjuvant radiotherapy for grade 2 meningiomas found no survival or local recurrence benefits, suggesting that current treatment paradigms may require reevaluation (ref: Rebchuk doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.088/). These findings collectively underscore the complexity of managing meningiomas and the necessity for tailored treatment strategies based on tumor characteristics and patient profiles.