Recent studies have highlighted the evolving landscape of immune therapies in melanoma, particularly focusing on the efficacy and safety profiles of novel combinations. The RELATIVITY-020 trial demonstrated that the combination of nivolumab and relatlimab yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.1 months and 3.2 months for two different dosing regimens, with a 6-month PFS rate of approximately 29.1% (ref: Ascierto doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02072/). In another study, nivolumab treatment in advanced melanoma patients showed favorable overall survival rates compared to historical controls, suggesting its continued relevance in treatment protocols (ref: Topalian doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02272/). However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment remains a challenge, as evidenced by findings that myeloperoxidase inhibition can enhance immune checkpoint therapy responses (ref: Liu doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005837/). Contradictory results emerged from the investigation of IDO1 inhibition, which unexpectedly conferred protection to melanoma cells against T cell-mediated attacks, indicating a complex role of immune modulation in tumor dynamics (ref: Kenski doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100941/). Furthermore, the presence of intratumoral CD16+ macrophages was associated with clinical outcomes in patients treated with combination therapies, underscoring the importance of immune cell composition in therapeutic responses (ref: Lee doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2657/). The integration of single-cell RNA sequencing revealed significant transcriptomic changes in immune cell populations during treatment, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches in immunotherapy (ref: Huuhtanen doi.org/10.1172/JCI164809/).