Recent studies have highlighted the evolving landscape of immunotherapy in melanoma, particularly focusing on immune evasion mechanisms and novel therapeutic strategies. One significant finding is the superior overall survival benefit of tebentafusp compared to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma, with a hazard ratio of 0.51 and one-year overall survival rates of 73% versus 59% respectively (ref: Piulats doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.013/). This emphasizes the potential of tebentafusp as a promising treatment option. Additionally, the ERK inhibitor LY3214996 has been shown to enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in preclinical models of BRAFV600E melanoma brain metastasis, suggesting that targeting specific signaling pathways may improve responses to existing immunotherapies (ref: de Sauvage doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/). Furthermore, the role of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 in promoting tumor immune evasion through the regulation of the NOD/VISTA axis has been elucidated, indicating a complex interplay between metabolic pathways and immune responses in melanoma (ref: Chen doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-007487/). Contradictory findings regarding the immune landscape in different treatment combinations, such as anti-PD-1+LAG-3 versus anti-PD-1+CTLA-4, reveal distinct immune cell dynamics, with the former leading to increased CD4+ T helper cells and the latter resulting in regulatory T cell accumulation (ref: Phadke doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-007239/). These insights underscore the necessity for personalized approaches in melanoma treatment, considering both immune evasion strategies and the tumor microenvironment.