The diagnostic accuracy of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) has been a significant concern, particularly in distinguishing it from other sarcomas. A study conducted in Brazil revealed a high rate of discordance in sarcoma diagnoses when samples were reviewed by specialized pathologists at a reference center. Specifically, complete discordance was observed in 13.2% of cases, with partial discordance in 45.2%, indicating that nearly 60% of initial diagnoses were modified upon expert review (ref: Lopes doi.org/10.1200/GO.23.00431/). This underscores the importance of specialized diagnostic techniques, including molecular pathology, in improving diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, a retrospective study in China highlighted the clinicopathological characteristics of uterine sarcomas, revealing that post-menopausal status and advanced stage were independent risk factors for poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in LMS patients (ref: Wang doi.org/10.1186/s13000-024-01517-x/). The study also noted that color Doppler flow imaging signals were associated with shorter PFS in the LMS group, suggesting potential imaging biomarkers for prognosis. Additionally, a diagnostic panel combining BCOR, Cyclin D1, and CD10 showed promising specificity in differentiating high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma from other uterine spindle cell lesions, emphasizing the need for refined diagnostic criteria (ref: Abouelkhair doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001213/).