Recent studies have focused on the efficacy of various diagnostic techniques for sarcoma, particularly comparing ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) and incisional biopsy (IB). In a study evaluating these methods, it was found that CNB achieved a malignancy diagnosis rate of 87% (83 of 95 cases), while IB had a slightly higher rate of 93% (54 of 58 cases). The histologic subtype identification was also comparable, with CNB identifying 80% (76 of 95) correctly versus 83% (48 of 58) for IB. These results suggest that ultrasound-guided CNB is a highly accurate method for diagnosing soft tissue sarcomas, demonstrating that it is not inferior to traditional IB techniques (ref: Cernakova doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96953-w/). Additionally, the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been explored in assessing the prognosis of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The study indicated that the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured by FDG-PET could predict the aggressiveness of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) and other histological subtypes. High SUVmax values were associated with a significantly shorter overall survival, particularly in DDLPS cases, where 45.5% of tumors with high SUVmax were Grade 3, contrasting with the lower grade tumors in the SUVmax low group (ref: Wakamatsu doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184611/). This highlights the potential of FDG-PET as a valuable tool in the prognostic evaluation of sarcomas.