Cervical cancer remains a significant public health challenge globally, necessitating effective screening and prevention strategies. Recent studies have highlighted the effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) screening compared to traditional cytological methods. For instance, a Finnish cohort study found that the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) was significantly higher in the hrHPV group (0.92%) compared to the cytology group (0.35%), with an adjusted risk ratio of 2.17 (ref: Turunen doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001435/). Additionally, a screen-and-treat strategy utilizing primary hrHPV testing in El Salvador demonstrated a lower detection rate of CIN2+ (0.7%) compared to cytology (2.1%), suggesting that hrHPV screening may lead to better outcomes (ref: Alfaro doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017983/). Furthermore, a study assessing the cervical cancer burden in China indicated rising incidence rates, particularly among older women in rural areas, emphasizing the need for targeted screening programs (ref: Ma doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0386/). The ecological assessment of global determinants for cervical cancer elimination also underscored the importance of addressing systemic challenges in health systems to achieve WHO targets (ref: Hyatt doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00310-9/). These findings collectively advocate for the integration of hrHPV screening and treatment strategies to enhance cervical cancer prevention efforts worldwide.