Recent advancements in CRISPR and genome editing techniques have significantly enhanced the precision and efficiency of genetic modifications. A notable study demonstrated the use of saturation genome editing (SGE) to functionally assess 9,188 unique variants in the RAD51C gene, revealing an impressive accuracy of variant classification exceeding 99.9% (ref: Olvera-León doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.039/). This method allows for a comprehensive understanding of pathogenic variants linked to breast and ovarian cancer, showcasing the potential of SGE in clinical applications. Additionally, the discovery of bacteriophage λ exonuclease's ability to enable PAM-independent targeting of double-stranded nucleic acids expands the CRISPR toolbox by mitigating off-target effects associated with PAM-dependent systems (ref: Fu doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02388-9/). This advancement could lead to more versatile applications in molecular diagnostics and therapeutic interventions. Moreover, increasing intracellular dNTP levels has been shown to improve prime editing efficiency, with modifications to reverse transcriptase yielding substantial increases in precise editing rates (ref: Liu doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02405-x/). The development of designer CRISPR-Cas-like transposons, such as IscB, further diversifies genome editing tools by utilizing non-coding RNA for targeted cleavage (ref: Unknown doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02460-x/). Collectively, these studies illustrate a dynamic evolution in genome editing methodologies, emphasizing the importance of optimizing both the tools and the cellular environments in which they operate.