Recent studies have focused on the efficacy of various treatment regimens for advanced endometrial cancer, particularly comparing novel therapies to traditional chemotherapy. One significant trial evaluated the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab against chemotherapy in previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. The results indicated that while the combination therapy showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.5 months compared to 10.2 months for chemotherapy, it did not meet the prespecified statistical criteria for superiority in PFS or overall survival (OS) in the pMMR population (ref: Marth doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01326/). Another promising approach involved the use of fulvestrant combined with abemaciclib, which yielded an objective response rate of 44%, suggesting potential for durable responses in hormone receptor-positive cases (ref: Green doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1999/). Cost-effectiveness analyses have also emerged, such as the study on dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel, which demonstrated gains of 2.0 life years and 1.5 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $143,783 per QALY gained, indicating its viability as a first-line treatment (ref: Coleman doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.021/). Furthermore, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been explored for recurrent cases, with a cohort study assessing morbidity and mortality predictors, highlighting the complexity of treatment decisions in this patient population (ref: Howlett doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213628/).