Chlamydia infections remain a significant public health concern, particularly among high-risk populations. Recent studies have explored various treatment strategies, including the use of doxycycline as a post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The DoxyPEP trial demonstrated that doxycycline effectively reduced the incidence of STIs, including chlamydia, among men who have sex with men and transgender women over a 12-month follow-up period (ref: Luetkemeyer doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00085-4/). In a separate study, Wijekoon et al. evaluated routine versus selective treatment for individuals reporting contact with chlamydia-positive partners, finding no significant change in treatment outcomes between the two approaches, which raises questions about the efficacy of selective treatment strategies (ref: Wijekoon doi.org/10.1093/infdis/). Furthermore, Ryan et al. investigated the relationship between Chlamydia trachomatis load and humoral immune responses, revealing that prior infection history influenced antibody levels, but not the correlation between load and antibody levels (ref: Ryan doi.org/10.1093/infdis/). These findings suggest a complex interplay between treatment strategies and individual immune responses that warrant further investigation. The implications of doxycycline use extend beyond treatment efficacy; Osmundson et al. reported on prescribing patterns and short-term outcomes among a diverse cohort of 2083 patients in a Los Angeles healthcare program, highlighting demographic trends and the potential for widespread doxycycline use in STI prevention (ref: Osmundson doi.org/10.1093/ofid/). Auchus et al. examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on STI rates, noting an increase in chlamydia associated with casual sexual partnerships among younger women, which underscores the need for targeted interventions in this demographic (ref: Auchus doi.org/10.1093/ofid/). Additionally, Milanova et al. introduced a novel self-collection method for STI testing, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity for detecting chlamydia, which could enhance screening accessibility (ref: Milanova doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03652-z/). Collectively, these studies highlight the evolving landscape of chlamydia management, emphasizing the importance of innovative treatment and diagnostic strategies.