Recent studies have explored various strategies in cardiovascular interventions, particularly focusing on the outcomes of different procedural approaches. One significant study compared the outcomes of immediate versus deferred nonculprit-lesion PCI in patients with myocardial infarction. The findings revealed that immediate iFR-guided PCI was not superior to deferred MRI-guided PCI concerning mortality and hospitalization rates over three years (ref: Nijveldt doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2512918/). In another trial, the PARTNER 3 study demonstrated that transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic-valve replacement yielded similar outcomes in low-risk patients over a seven-year period, emphasizing the viability of TAVR as a less invasive option (ref: Leon doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2509766/). Additionally, a multicenter trial comparing PCI of native coronary arteries versus saphenous vein grafts in post-CABG patients found a significantly higher incidence of PCI-related myocardial infarction in the native vessel group, suggesting that saphenous vein graft PCI may be a safer alternative (ref: de Winter doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1577/). Furthermore, a study on percutaneous transcatheter valve replacement for mitral regurgitation reported a primary endpoint rate of 25.7%, significantly lower than the prespecified performance goal of 45%, indicating promising outcomes for patients unsuitable for surgery (ref: Guerrero doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02073-2/). Lastly, a study on arterial catheterization in critically ill patients highlighted the lower incidence of complications in noninvasive strategies compared to invasive approaches, reinforcing the need for tailored intervention strategies (ref: Muller doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2502136/).