Recent studies have explored the efficacy of different ablation techniques for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). One pivotal trial compared pulsed field ablation (PFA) with cryoballoon ablation, focusing on the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias within a year post-procedure. The findings indicated that PFA was noninferior to cryoballoon ablation, demonstrating similar rates of arrhythmia recurrence when assessed through continuous rhythm monitoring (ref: Reichlin doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2502280/). This suggests that PFA could be a viable alternative to cryoballoon ablation, potentially offering a less invasive option for patients. Furthermore, the implications of these findings are significant, as they may influence clinical decision-making regarding the choice of ablation technique based on patient-specific factors and preferences. In addition to ablation techniques, the role of cardiovascular medications in managing patients with AF has also been highlighted. For instance, dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, was evaluated in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The study revealed that dapagliflozin did not significantly reduce mortality compared to standard care, although it may provide benefits in managing heart failure symptoms (ref: Raposeiras-Roubin doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2500366/). This underscores the importance of integrating pharmacological therapies with procedural interventions to optimize outcomes in AF patients.